Emil Sutovsky: "Forfeiting the Player for Being a Few Seconds Late is Not In the Spirit of a Chess Tradition"

Время публикации: 28.02.2013 03:57 | Последнее обновление: 28.02.2013 03:57

Emil Sutovsky, the president of ACP commented on some of the decisions published by FIDE recently, in his interview given to Chesspro. 

"According to the Regulation the Sofia Rules will be cancelled in the qualification Swiss format tournaments starting from this year. I have spent a lot of time to explain and prove it had to cancelled. Of course it's not nice to see the empty tables, but it is also not really nice to force people, who are covering all the expenses by themselves, to play. In my view there's a simple, but convincing argument: Sofia rules in principle contradict to the very format of the qualification Swiss. And that's actually not my conclusion, it was made by the special ECU commission which regulated the introduction of Sofia rules in all tournaments.

I support the idea of having the Sofia rules in round-robin tournaments and I think we lacked them before, but again I’m against of draconian measures. […] Forfeit for the draw is a try to intimidate the players. Actually I’m very happy (I believe this was very important) we managed to uphold Baron and Safarli. They agreed on a draw in a well known position by threefold repetition. Both had 50% of points up to 9th round, they were playing in the second playing hall, the game wasn’t broadcasted and actually they played on a plastic set in the bathing place. So they were “waylaid” and both registered losses. I have immediately said that we wouldn’t leave that incident just like that. This was discussed at the qualification commission; then I voiced this situation at the meeting of WCOC, because the European championship is still just a qualification tournament, so I insisted that was irrational and illogical. You had a threefold repetition on the board and even if they didn’t call the coach forfeit wasn’t the correct decision. My arguments were heard, so both players will be given 5 ELO points back. … We showed that we can fight till the end and that we can be heard. Unfortunately, there's a great amount of people who change having even just a slight power. It is important to state that there won’t be any kind of permissiveness here.                      

Yet nothing can be done with forfeiting for being late. I have met Kirsan Nikolayevich personally, he listened to me carefully, but hasn’t changed his mind; he thinks this rule disciplines the players, for the chess player really needs to concentrate before the game. I believe any kind of fine or just return to the old rules is better than what we have today. I was asking Kirsan Nikolayevich to impose a moratorium on this rule, while I would talk to the players, or we could have this rule at top tournaments where the famous players compete, however, I didn’t succeed. I guess forfeiting the player for being a few seconds late is not in the spirit of chess tradition. That is an attempt to make chess only a sport, but I can’t even remember at once in which sport we do have such a rule.”


Смотрите также...

  • E.SUROV: Mark Izrailovich, do you know any unfair chess players?

    М.DVORETSKY: Sure, I do.

    Е.SUROV: Name them.

  • I suggest you to think over this phrase:

  • Е.SUROV: Here’s a surprise for you, ladies and gentlemen! Veselin Topalov joins us live from Zug. Veselin, hello!

    V.TOPALOV: Hello.

    Е.SUROV: How long was the closing ceremony?

    V. TOPALOV: It lasted for about half an hour and was just typical, normal.

    E.SUROV: Was there anything interesting, let’s say special?

  • E.SUROV: We are at the World Championship Match. I’m Evgeny Surov and next to me is Evgeny Sveshnikov, who got here just in time. Did you really guess it? Did you know what was going to be played today?

  • Journalists continue trying to understand what is going on in the strongest Grandmasters' heads. We offer you a part of Levon Aronian's interview to "Yerevan" magazine. 


  • One of the EICC participants David Shengelia, who represents Austria, joined us live on Chess-News radio today. It turned out something else than a lost game against Moiseenko on the first board made him upset, “This is a very important thing to mention. Today’s lost game didn’t upset me as much as my opponent’s – I don’t even know how to call it – silly, stupid commentary after the game. My rival said that he suspected me of using the computer during the game.

  • E.SUROV: Vladimir Kramnik, the match has finished. When it became known that the match will go ahead, you said that you view it, first of all, as training for the Candidates tournament. It so happened that the tournament will not happen that soon, but only in a year’s time. What do you think about this match as a stage of preparation for something?


    M.BOYARD: This is Chess-News and we have two honor guests today- Mr. Silvio Danailov, the President of ECU and Artur Czyz, the tournament director of the XIV EICC. Welcome and thank you very much for accepting our invitation.
    So, the first question goes to Mr. Silvio Danailov and it’s about the ECU Board, which took place during the last days. Could you tell us a bit about the new decisions you’ve voted for?

  • E.SUROV: This is Chess-News and we are in Batumi. I am Evgeny Surov and the President of the Georgian Chess Federation Gia Girogadze is with me. How do you do.

    G.GIORGADZE: Hello.

  • Evgeny Sveshnikov asks FIDE to publish the names of those who supported the rule of forfeits for the phone calls during the round, “Let us know the concrete names. I’m not asking to disqualify them – we will do that by our own, without FIDE.”

    According to Sveshnikov this is “the most absurd rule one could imagine. It’s obvious that the person who got a phone call won’t get prompts in that way.”